Big Rise in Hunger Projected for Africa

Big Rise in Hunger Projected for Africa Report Stresses Need for Massive Investment


By Karl Vick

Washington Post Foreign Service

Tuesday, September 4, 2001


BANANA HILL, Kenya--Stephen Waithaka, who farms two acres of the rich volcanic soil on the foothills below Mount

Kenya, brings in two crops of corn a year, but lives in constant fear of not having enough.


"In the last five seasons we did not sell anything, because we did not have rain," Waithaka said of a crop that drought has

reduced by half. "We still had enough for ourselves.


"I fear others did not."


The fear is well founded. A comprehensive study of whether the world will have enough to eat 20 years from now concludes

that Africa, at least, probably will not.


The report by the International Food Policy Research Institute, a Washington think tank, predicts rising hunger on the continent, which is notorious for periodic famines and struggles to feed itself even in normal times.


The study concludes that without massive investment in irrigation, roads to take the harvest to market and crop research, Africa might have 49 million malnourished children by 2020, a rise of 50 percent. At the same time, the rest of the world, including India and China, will be better nourished than it is today, the report predicts.


African experts on agriculture, a sector widely neglected by African governments even though three-quarters of Africans are

farmers, consider that prediction credible.


"They are really seeing things as they are," said Mercy W. Karanja, chief executive of the Kenya National Farmers' Union,

referring to the report released last week. "We're talking budgetary allocations in Kenya of 4 percent for agriculture, of which 3 percent is supporting the parastatals [state-owned enterprises]. It is such an insult to farmers. This does not show even



Finding enough to eat is a daily challenge for the vast majority of Africa's nearly 700 million people. Most Africans rely on

homestead plots of one or two acres for survival. They cultivate staples such as corn or cassava, eat what they need and stack

any surplus for sale on a plastic sheet at the local market. The pennies from those sales may be the only cash the household

sees. It will buy the used clothing that most Africans wear, or perhaps a handful of tomatoes from the next plastic sheet in the

market. Meat is a rare treat.


"What do you do? If you can't buy the food, you have to raise it yourself," said Waithaka, 48. His family of seven has survived

off of two acres on Banana Hill, a nominally residential township outside Nairobi, since his job as an insurance surveyor went

south with the Kenyan economy five years ago.


Far more than the sporadic wars that dominate headlines, this precarious hand-to-mouth existence defines life on the continent

two generations after most of its countries gained independence from European colonial masters.


Ambitions declared in the flush of nationalism -- industrialization by the year 2020, in Kenya's case -- have gone the way of

broken telephone systems, cratered roads and health centers better stocked with mildew than medicines.


Hunger binds the continent as it binds the stomach. In Sudan, where a history of war-related famine prompted the United

Nations to establish a permanent food airlift, a Dinka tribeswoman hands back a snapshot of a relief worker's daughter with the words: "She is beautiful. She is not hungry."


A thousand miles to the south, in peaceful Malawi, a political party's slogan, "Get the grain, not the husks," is no metaphor. In

blackened cooking pots outside residents' mud huts, a rolling boil softens a dinner of chaff.


The report, based on a computer model taking into account population, prices and production data for 16 commodities,

delivers a mixed message. Worldwide, rising outputs and declining prices mean that the global market's growing demand for

cereals was generally met over the past two decades. In the process, the global rate of malnutrition among children under age 5 dropped from 45 percent in the 1960s to 31 percent today.


But in Africa, many people are simply too poor to participate in the global market. Population gains outpaced cereal production on the continent between 1967 and 1997, and countries lacked the hard currency to purchase imports that would have filled the gap.


As a result, a third of African children suffer from hunger. The institute said that by 2020 that number will likely reach 39 to 49

percent, depending on whether conditions remain the same as today or grow worse. The report acknowledges that given

Africa's troubling trends in governance, the pessimistic forecast is more likely.


"To really get the purchasing power to buy food, you have to produce more food," said Mark W. Rosegrant, the primary

author of the report, called 2020 Global Food Outlook. "It's kind of a vicious circle right now."


The key, Rosegrant said, appears to be larger yields. A single acre in Europe produces six times the cereal harvested from an

acre in Africa, on average. Few African farmers use fertilizer or irrigate their fields. They live at the mercy of the weather, which in East Africa has been especially unpredictable since the 1997 floods caused by El Nino.


"This is the biggest problem we have here in agriculture -- the water," said Waithaka, one of the few farmers on Banana Hill to

have built a concrete reservoir. "With rain, we will never go hungry. But there's a problem: It depends on the rain."


Another challenge is transport, Rosegrant said. In its search for arable land, Africa's rural population has moved even farther

from the increasingly rare usable roads. And if there is no access to markets, gains in production stand to be wasted.


Karanja, the farmers' union chief, said Kenya's current harvest illustrates the point. Despite a bumper crop in corn, the country

is accepting hundreds of tons of relief food. Western donors truck it themselves to the remote, semiarid northern reaches that

Kenyan merchants scarcely supply.


"In the '70s, Kenya was self-sufficient for food," Karanja said, "but then the infrastructure was not so run-down."


Africa would stand to gain more than any other region by full liberalization of trade laws, Rosegrant said, not least because it

would remove domestic taxes on production and consumption that discourage farmers from investing.


In all, African governments will need to invest $133 billion over the next 20 years to avoid the predicted sharp rise in

malnutrition, the report says.


Some experts say the money should go toward research aimed at developing crops that will thrive in Africa's often-marginal

soils, plus roads, irrigation, education and clean water. The $133 billion does not include investments in basic health care that

International Monetary Fund and World Bank experts say will be fundamental to improving Africa's economy and alleviating

the effect of the AIDS virus, which has infected more than 20 million people.


These recommendations assume that Africa's often dysfunctional governments will pay attention. To date, Rosegrant said, only

a handful -- including Uganda, Botswana, Ghana and Mozambique -- share their citizens' preoccupation with feeding

themselves. Karanja complains that Kenya's national irrigation board "has collapsed."


"Some of it is probably power politics," said Delphin Rwegasira, executive director of the African Economic Research

Consortium, a Nairobi group. "Power politics is determined in cities. The rural poor just don't have this empowerment, this



Rwegasira said that as more rural Africans migrate to cities, the demands on the food supply will grow "very dangerous."


"The urban sector is growing very fast," he said. "But without the food . . ."


2001 The Washington Post Company