The Poverty Summit
Washington Post, Editorial: Friday, July 20, 2001
THE BUSH administration declares that the theme of the G-7
summit beginning today is poverty alleviation. This theme,
National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice explains, is
"an extension in many ways of the president's own compassionate
conservatism." President Bush himself has delivered a
speech on the antipoverty agenda, calling for the World Bank to convert
part of its lending into outright grants and emphasizing the
importance of freer trade to devThe Poverty Summit
Friday, July 20, 2001; Page A30
THE BUSH administration declares that the theme of the G-7
summit beginning today is poverty alleviation. This theme,
National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice explains, is
"an extension in many ways of the president's own compassionate
conservatism." President Bush himself has delivered a
speech on the antipoverty agenda, calling for the World Bank to convert
part of its lending into outright grants and emphasizing the
importance of freer trade to development. This new focus is
admirable: As the president rightly says, "A world
where some live in comfort and plenty while half of the human race lives on
less than $2 a day is neither just nor stable." Mr.
Bush must now back his words with action.
A renewed fight against poverty will cost money -- not much
relative to other categories of government spending, but a lot
relative to what the United States has been willing to
provide recently. The nation's aid budget stands at 0.1 percent of GDP,
the lowest share of any country in the 22-member
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, and much lower
than the 0.8 percent of GDP that the United States gave in
1960. In this year's budget proposal, the Bush administration did
nothing to address this failure. To the contrary, it
recommended a cut in development spending of $380 million after adjusting
for inflation.
This tight-fisted approach undermines many of the
administration's better policy instincts. Mr. Bush may be correct, for
example, that the World Bank should switch partially from
loans to grants, since past lending has mired poor countries in debt.
But if the bank is to boost grants, it will need more money
from rich nations such as the United States -- and the administration
will have to spend political capital on getting Congress to
deliver.
Likewise, the administration made the right decision in
announcing a contribution to an international AIDS fund that will be
launched at the summit. But the contribution amounts to a
mere $200 million, or 70 cents per American. True, the United States gives
nearly $1 billion a year in AIDS assistance through other channels, more than
any other country. But the global effort against AIDS is reckoned to need
between $7 billion and $10 billion a year. If the United States, accounting for
nearly a
quarter of world output, were to give its proper share, it
would double current spending.
To be fair, the administration has made trade liberalization
a big part of its antipoverty agenda, and here the aid budget is less
vital. But despite the importance of launching a new global
trade round, trade cannot eliminate the need for aid. The World
Bank estimates that scrapping all rich-country tariffs on
goods from sub-Saharan Africa would boost the region's income by
$2.5 billion a year -- a very real gain but by no means a
cure to poverty. Moreover, a global trade round probably can't get off
the ground unless the administration is open to softening
U.S. anti-dumping laws. So far it has proved too fearful of the steel
lobby to suggest this.
"We have, today, the opportunity to include all the
world's poor in an expanding circle of development," Mr. Bush declared
this week. "This is a great moral challenge. . . . This cause is a
priority of the United States foreign policy, because we do recognize our
responsibilities, and because having strong and stable nations as neighbors in
the world is in our own best interests." Mr. Bush has laid down a
yardstick by which to judge his administration.
© 2001 The
Washington Post Company